BCS National Championship Game Open Thread
See original here:
BCS National Championship Game Open Thread
Filed under Lets Talk Texas by on Jan 10th, 2012. Comment.
Ten reasons why you should root for the Oklahoma State Cowboys to play for the BCS Championship.
Here is the original post:
Why I’m Rooting for Oklahoma State… And You Should Too
Filed under Lets Talk Texas by on Nov 16th, 2011. Comment.
WHAT I’M LOOKING FOR THIS WEEK I’m looking for some sanity. Not just for myself, but for the Sagarin college football rankings, which are a component of the weekly BCS standings.
See the article here:
Texas vs. Texas Tech: What Kirk Bohls is looking for
Filed under Football, News by on Nov 2nd, 2011. Comment.
My colleague, Joe Schad, is reporting that the Big 12 has told West Virginia it will be accepted into the conference pending formal approval, which could happen very soon. While Texas A&M and TCU, which recently announced conference moves, will join their new conferences for the 2012 season, Schad notes the Big East could try to keep WVU, along with Pitt and Syracuse, in the conference for up to 27 months, per conference guidelines. Why would the Big East play hardball with its defectors? Because more than $20 million per year is at stake given the Big East’s automatic-BCS-qualifying status. For the 2011-12 school year, BCS conferences will receive $22.3 million for their qualifying team and can earn another $6.1 million if another member receives an at-large berth. A non-automatic-qualifying conference team selected for a BCS game receives $26.4 million but must divide that revenue with the other four non-automatic-qualifying conferences. If the Big East were to lose Pitt, Syracuse and West Virginia at the end of this school year, it could jeopardize the Big East’s BCS status. Here’s how it works: Current BCS conferences were determined based on data from the 2004-07 football seasons. Data from the 2008-11 seasons will be reviewed following this season to determine if a seventh conference makes the cut to be an automatic-qualifier for the 2012 and 2013 BCS bowl seasons. In addition to that review, each current BCS conference is reviewed for annual qualification. This is where it gets dicey for conferences losing teams. Three sets of data are considered in the annual review: First, the average ranking of the highest-ranked team in the BCS standings over the four-year period; second, the average rank of all the conference’s teams based onĀ rankings from each of the six BCS computers over the four-year period; and third, something called a conference’s Adjusted Top 25 Performance — a calculation based on a conference’s number of teams in the Top 25 of BCS standings over the four-year period as a percentage of the top conference in this calculation, which would have been rated 100 percent. The threshold for annual qualification requires each conference to be in the top six in the first two sets of data and in the top 50 percent in the third set of data. However, a waiver can be obtained from the BCS’ Presidential Oversight Committee if a conference is in the top six of the first two sets of data and top 33 percent of the third set, or top five of one of the first two sets and top seven in the other, along with top 33 percent of the third set. When asked how conference realignment might affect these reviews, Maxey Parrish of the BCS said: “Since it’s impossible to determine how a team would have played had they been a member of another conference, the rankings count for the conference schools [which] were members of [the conference] at that time. For example, TCU is not factored into the Big 12’s status as an AQ until the 2012 season.” What happens if a conference doesn’t meet the annual threshold? “Then there is the potential for them to be taken off the list of AQ conferences.” Perhaps that explains why the Big East maintains and enforces a 27-month waiting period before schools can exit. Doing so buys the conference time — all the way through the current BCS agreements in place through the bowl games following the 2013 season. Big East Associate Commissioner John Paquette did not address whether that could be the reason for wanting to keep the defectors, saying: “The 27-month exit is part of our policy that was agreed to by our membership in a vote previous to Pitt and Syracuse leaving.”

Continue reading here:
Millions of reasons for Big East’s stance
Filed under Football by on Oct 25th, 2011. Comment.
LSU and Alabama remained Nos. 1 and 2 in the BCS standings on Sunday night, setting up an historic showdown between the two SEC teams in Tuscaloosa, Ala., on Nov. 5. The Tigers blasted Auburn 45-10 on Saturday, and the Crimson Tide overcame a slow start to defeat Tennessee 37-6 on Saturday. Both teams are off this upcoming week, setting up what should be the first regular-season meeting between SEC teams ranked Nos. 1 and 2. But Oklahoma State, which defeated Missouri 45-24 on Saturday, might have been the biggest winner after this past weekend’s action. After BCS national championship contenders Oklahoma and Wisconsin both lost Saturday night, the Pokes jumped to No. 3 in the BCS standings. In fact, OSU has a sizable advantage (.0938 points) over No. 4 Boise State. The Badgers lost at Michigan State 37-31 on a Hail Mary pass on the final play of the game. Oklahoma’s 39-game home winning streak ended in a 41-38 loss to Texas Tech. The Sooners fell to No. 9 in the BCS standings; the Badgers fell even farther, to No. 15. The Pokes, who host Baylor on Saturday and No. 11 Kansas State on Nov. 5, remained No. 1 in five of the six computer rankings used in the BCS formula. OSU is ranked No. 3 in the Harris Poll and No. 4 in the USA Today coaches’ poll , which make up two-thirds of the BCS formula. The top two teams in the final BCS standings on Dec. 4 will play in the Allstate BCS National Championship Game in New Orleans on Jan. 9. Right now, the Pokes are in the best position to potentially face the winner of the LSU-Alabama game, as long as those teams keep winning. The Cowboys will also play Oklahoma in their annual Bedlam game in Stillwater, Okla., on Dec.

View original post here:
LSU, Alabama set for historic clash
Filed under Football by on Oct 24th, 2011. Comment.
LSU and Alabama remained Nos. 1 and 2 in the BCS standings on Sunday night, setting up an historic showdown between the two SEC teams in Tuscaloosa, Ala., on Nov. 5. The Tigers blasted Auburn 45-10 on Saturday, and the Crimson Tide overcame a slow start to defeat Tennessee 37-6 on Saturday. Both teams are off this upcoming week, setting up what should be the first regular-season meeting between SEC teams ranked Nos. 1 and 2. But Oklahoma State, which defeated Missouri 45-24 on Saturday, might have been the biggest winner after this past weekend’s action. After BCS national championship contenders Oklahoma and Wisconsin both lost Saturday night, the Pokes jumped to No. 3 in the BCS standings. In fact, OSU has a sizable advantage (.0938 points) over No. 4 Boise State. The Badgers lost at Michigan State 37-31 on a Hail Mary pass on the final play of the game. Oklahoma’s 39-game home winning streak ended in a 41-38 loss to Texas Tech. The Sooners fell to No. 9 in the BCS standings; the Badgers fell even farther, to No. 15. The Pokes, who host Baylor on Saturday and No. 11 Kansas State on Nov. 5, remained No. 1 in five of the six computer rankings used in the BCS formula. OSU is ranked No. 3 in the Harris Poll and No. 4 in the USA Today coaches’ poll , which make up two-thirds of the BCS formula. The top two teams in the final BCS standings on Dec. 4 will play in the Allstate BCS National Championship Game in New Orleans on Jan. 9. Right now, the Pokes are in the best position to potentially face the winner of the LSU-Alabama game, as long as those teams keep winning. The Cowboys will also play Oklahoma in their annual Bedlam game in Stillwater, Okla., on Dec. 3. A few other observations from the second set of BCS standings: LSU is still ranked No. 3 in four of the six computer rankings. The Tigers are No. 1 in Billingsley and No. 2 in Massey. The Tigers’ lead over the Crimson Tide in the BCS standings grew from .0003 last week to .0075 this week. What more does No. 6 Stanford have to do to impress voters and the computers? After routing then-No. 25 Washington 65-21 on Saturday, the Cardinal remained behind No. 5 Clemson in the BCS standings. The Cardinal should get a bump if they defeat USC this weekend and No. 7 Oregon in November. Stanford is ranked eighth or worse in four of the six computer rankings, but is ranked No. 3 in the coaches’ poll and No. 4 in the Harris Poll. The Pac-12’s lack of depth also seems to be hurting No. 7 Oregon. Despite opening the season against No. 1 LSU in Arlington, Texas, the Ducks are No

Visit link:
LSU, Alabama set for historic clash
Filed under Football by on Oct 24th, 2011. Comment.
Wisconsin coach Bret Bielema has more pressing concerns than worrying about the initial Bowl Championship Series standings, which were released on Sunday night. “I’m sure it will come across my desk,” Bielema said Sunday afternoon. “I haven’t been waiting for it.” Bielema couldn’t be happy with what he saw. Bielema, whose Badgers are off to a 6-0 start and lead the country in scoring with more than 50 points per game, were No. 6 in the initial BCS standings. The Badgers are ranked No. 4 in both the Harris Poll and USA Today coaches’ poll, which make up two-thirds of the BCS formula. The top two teams in the final BCS standings released on Dec. 4 will play in the Jan. 9 Allstate BCS National Championship Game in New Orleans. But the Badgers’ average rating in six computer polls was 11th. The Badgers were ranked as low as No. 17 in Kenneth Massey’s ratings and No. 6 by Jeff Sagarin. “I think we’re a team that’s gotten better week by week,” Bielema said. The Badgers’ are undoubtedly hurt by their soft non-conference schedule. Wisconsin’s three nonconference FBS opponents — UNLV, Oregon State and Northern Illinois — have a combined record of 6-13. Only the Huskies have a winning record. The Badgers also played FCS foe South Dakota. “Our nonconference schedule is what it is,” Bielema said. “Those things are set so far in advance you just try to get a quality opponent.” The good news for Wisconsin

See the original post here:
Wisconsin needs help in BCS standings
Filed under Football, News by on Oct 17th, 2011. Comment.
Baylor’s quarterback, Robert Griffin… Source: Bleacher Report
![]()
See the original post:
Texas Football Schedule: The Longhorns’ Path to Climbing the BCS Rankings
Filed under Football, News by on Oct 11th, 2011. Comment.
Brad Edwards reviews the BCS ramifications of the outcome of this week’s big game as the Oklahoma State Cowboys visit the Longhorns in Austin.

Excerpt from:
Video: Oklahoma State vs. Texas preview
Filed under Football by on Oct 10th, 2011. Comment.
The Oklahoma Sooners are on fire right now, fresh off a blowout 55-17 win against arch rival Texas . The Longhorns couldn’t withstand the Sooners defense, and in the game Oklahoma sacked Texas eight times. Oklahoma shouldn’t be worried… Source: Bleacher Report
![]()
The rest is here:
Projected BCS Rankings: Forecasting How Next Week’s BCS Top 5 Will Look
Filed under Basketball, News by on Oct 9th, 2011. Comment.
